Quoting Rancière to authorise irreverence

Justifying irreverence towards the thoughts of others.

‘Not disturbing the reflections of poor people is perhaps also the condition for acceding to the poetic pantheon. For myself, not being bound by the same obligation, I have been happy to disturb this woman of the people, to mingle our thoughts with hers for a moment;…’ (Rancière 2011: 32-33)

Justifying irreverence towards the time of my reader.

‘… saying that we are concerned with practices and not with ideology, means massively confirming, beneath that seeming honesty of a good methodological principle, the initial division that is rightly challenged in this discourse of the impossible: the division between those whose lot is production and struggle, and those whose lot is discourse and ideology.

The singularity of this discourse, therefore, is no easier for the discourse of history to appropriate than it is for that of philosophy. To the very extent that it provides the possibility of its identification, or lends history its material, it finds itself excluded and rejected into what is not historical. It has to disappear from history, not as repressed, forbidden or unthought, but rather as insignificant: mere verbiage that cannot be counted on any of the registers where speech is deemed to lead to action. Hence the necessarily labryinthine and evanescent form of this account,’ (Rancière 2011: 30)

Reference
Rancière, J., 2011. Staging the people : the proletarian and his double, London & New York: Verso Books.

Advertisements

Tags:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s